Prosecutors seek to limit claims at trial of Epstein associate
Lawyers for a British socialite are trying to put conspiracy theories and other topics “one galaxy to another” before a jury that will decide whether she helped Jeffrey Epstein abuse teenage girls, prosecutors told Friday. a judge.
The government and defense lawyers have submitted arguments to the judge who will preside over the November trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, 59, who has been incarcerated since her arrest in July 2020 for recruiting teenage girls to be sexually abused by Epstein. is sometimes associated with abuse.
She pleaded not guilty. Epstein died in a Manhattan jail in August 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking. The death was ruled a suicide.
The final preliminary hearing is Monday. Candidate jurors will complete questionnaires later in the week and their oral examination will begin in mid-November. The opening statements are scheduled for November 29.
In Friday’s submission, prosecutors said the defense planned to create a “side show” with foreign subjects.
They said conspiracy theories the defense wants to bring to trial include allegations about the government’s motives for indicting Maxwell, “alleged evidence relating to consent of underage victims,” ââMaxwell’s statements, evidence of other abuse. not involving Maxwell and evidence that Maxwell prevailed. in civil litigation.
âThese subjects are far away – a galaxy far away – questions of fact to be resolved by the jury. The government is concerned that the defense is considering overstepping its limits and, therefore, has decided to prevent the defense from arguing them or offering evidence about them, âprosecutors wrote.
Defense attorneys retorted that prosecutors were attempting to “improperly obtain advisory decisions” from the judge and attempt to “prematurely and unconstitutionally force Ms Maxwell to reveal theories, strategies and cross-examination of the defense” .
They said it was too early to limit the evidence because the judge “lacks the facts necessary to make intelligent decisions.”
Lawyers wrote that prosecutors sought to exclude evidence or argument that the accusers consented to sexual touching. They argue that some evidence from accusers who were minors at the time of the alleged sexual abuse may be admissible.
They said the age of consent for sexual contact varies by state and nation.
New York defines a minor as a person under the age of 17; Florida considers him to be under 18; UK under 16; France under 15; and New Mexico does not have a specific age of consent law, but criminalizes all sexual contact by a minor under the age of 13 when it comes to coercion or force, lawyers said.